Citigroup was dropped from plans to underwrite Texas’ largest ever municipal bond—a $3.4 billion plan to raise investment in the state’s natural gas industry—over its oppositional stance to the firearms industry.
“Citi’s designation as an SB-19 discriminator has the effect of halting its ability to underwrite most municipal bond offerings in Texas,” Paxton’s office said.
The investment bank contends that its policies do not discriminate against the firearms industry.
“We’re disappointed with the decision and will remain engaged with the Texas AG office to review our options,“ a Citigroup spokesperson told NTD News. ”Citi has been financing public works in Texas for more than 150 years and we currently have more than 8,500 employees who call Texas home. As we’ve said previously, Citi does not discriminate against the firearms sector and believe we are in compliance with Texas law.”
Citigroup declined to provide further comment when asked to specify what constitutes a “high-capacity magazine.”
Municipal Bonds
The $3.4 billion municipal bond appears to be the first major deal Citigroup will miss out on after being labeled a “discriminator” against the firearms industry.Texas Blocking Other Investors
In addition to blocking state and local entities from doing business with firms that discriminate against the firearms industry, Texas also passed Bill SB 13 in 2021 that prohibits state and local government entities from doing business with firms that boycott the fossil fuel industry.The law defines boycotting companies as those that “without an ordinary business purpose” decided to terminate contracts or refuse to do business altogether with fossil fuel industry members, or who take “any action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations” with a company that’s involved in the fossil fuel industry.
“This research uncovered a systemic lack of transparency that should concern every American, regardless of political persuasion, especially the use of doublespeak by some financial institutions as they engage in anti-oil and gas rhetoric publicly, yet present a much different story behind closed doors,” Hegar said. “This list represents our initial effort to shine a light on entities that are engaging in these practices and create some clarity for Texans whose tax dollars may be working to directly undermine our state’s economic health.”