Around 100,000 Opel Vehicles to Be Recalled in Diesel Probe - Ministry

Around 100,000 Opel Vehicles to Be Recalled in Diesel Probe - Ministry
An Opel logo is pictured in Ruesselsheim, Germany, on July 4, 2018. Ralph Orlowski/Reuters
Reuters
Updated:

Germany’s Transport Ministry said on Oct. 15, it would order roughly 100,000 Opel vehicles to be recalled as part of an emissions probe, after prosecutors searched the carmaker’s offices earlier in the day.

German motor vehicle authority KBA found four software programs capable of altering vehicle emissions in 2015, and ordered Opel to implement a software update in cars to remove them, Germany’s Transport Ministry said in a statement.

“After a fifth software device was discovered in early 2018, which KBA found to be illegal, there is currently an official hearing going on with the goal of imposing a mandatory recall for the models Cascada, Insignia and Zafira,” the ministry said in a statement.

Opel said it was fully cooperating with authorities but that it could not comment on details of the investigation.
“Opel reaffirms that its vehicles comply with the applicable regulations,” it said.

The transport ministry said Opel had dragged its feet on the hearing. The KBA had told Frankfurt prosecutors about the software device in April, it said.

“The official recall of the affected roughly 100,000 vehicles will take place shortly,” it added.

German prosecutors searched offices at Opel’s sites in Ruesselsheim and Kaiserslautern earlier on Monday.

The Frankfurt prosecutor’s office said it was probing 95,000 vehicles equipped with Euro 6d engines.

PSA Group, which owns the Opel and Vauxhall brands, declined to comment.

The Opel Insignia, Zafira and Cascada were developed when Opel and its sister brand Vauxhall were still owned by General Motors. General Motors sold Opel to PSA Group in 2017.

Opel admitted in 2016 that its Zafira model contained engine software which switched off exhaust emissions treatment systems under certain circumstances. Opel insisted at the time that it was making use of a legal loophole.

By Hans Seidenstuecker and Irene Preisinger