Biden administration officials proceeded to release more than 2,700 illegal immigrants into the United States through a special parole policy mere hours after a federal court ordered a pause to the practice.
The state of Florida sued the Biden administration last week in a challenge to the administration’s parole program, which allowed border officials to release illegal immigrants into the United States without a set court date. The rule is known as the “Policy on Parole with Conditions in Limited Circumstances Prior to the Issuance of a Charging Document,“ or ”Parole with Conditions.”
Despite Wetherell’s TRO, however, DHS officials proceeded to release 2,743 illegal immigrants into the United States on Friday without court dates through the “Parole with Conditions” policy.
Judge Declines Contempt Ruling
Wetherell declined to find DHS officials in contempt for releasing the 2,743 illegal immigrants after the TRO went into effect. Still, the judge questioned how the DHS officials could have concluded that they were allowed to release any additional immigrants through the “Parole with Conditions” policy after the TRO.Wetherell said that in an ideal situation, the DHS officials “would have sought clarification from the Court before making a unilateral decision to release aliens under the authority of the Parole with Conditions policy after the TRO took effect.” Nevertheless, the judge concluded the TRO he issued had not been clear enough.
“Because the Court is required to construe any uncertainties in the order in the light most favorable [to the] DHS, the Court cannot say that DHS willfully disregarded the authority of the Court by releasing the 2,576 aliens when it did,” he added.
Wetherell deferred on the issue of the 167 additional parolees who were released even though their parole processing may not have been fully complete before the TRO went into effect. He ordered the DHS to provide additional details about these parolees by Friday.
Wetherell’s TRO was originally set to last for 14 days, but on Tuesday he converted the order into a preliminary injunction. The decision could extend the block on the “Parole with Conditions” policy until the court reaches a final judgment on the policy.
DHS officials filed an appeal on Tuesday, seeking to overturn the preliminary injunction.