Beto O’Rourke, a Democratic presidential contender, again called for the Electoral College to be abolished, when speaking at the We The People summit in Washington on April 1.
“This is one of those bad compromises we made on day one in this country,” O'Rourke, who is from Texas, said when answering a question from the audience at the event. “Let’s abolish the electoral college.”
Hans von Spakovsky, a former member of the Federal Election Commission, said that the Electoral College system was devised at America’s founding to balance the competing interests of large and small states, and to temper the “tyranny of the majority.”
Beto O’Rourke, a progressive, continued saying at the event, “If we get rid of the Electoral College, we’d get a little closer to one person, one vote in the United States of America”—an argument often used by the progressive side of politics to do away with the Electoral College.
He continued, “[Our democracy,] it is warped, it is corrupted right now. If we cannot fix it, if we cannot get it right ... [what] we are going to lose is this democracy itself.”
“I think there’s a lot to that. Because you had an election in 2016 where the loser got 3 million more votes than the victor,” O’Rourke, who is a former three-term congressman, said.
He added, “If we really want everyone to vote, to give them every reason to vote, we have to make sure their votes count and go to the candidate of their choosing.”
Push to Abolish Electoral College Gains Momentum
Along with O'Rourke, another presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts has also made comments, calling for the Electoral College to be abolished.“My view is that every vote matters,” Warren said in Jackson, the state’s capital, in the middle of a three-day swing through the South. “And the way we can make that happen is that we can have national voting, and that means get rid of the Electoral College—and every vote counts.”
Similarly, the progressive Democratic Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) has also pushed for the system to be revamped.
“It is well past time we eliminate the Electoral College, a shadow of slavery’s power on America today that undermines our nation as a democratic republic,” she wrote on Twitter last year.
100 Yard Dash vs Marathon
President Trump voiced his opposition to the move to abolish the electoral vote earlier this month.“Campaigning for the Popular Vote is much easier & different than campaigning for the Electoral College,” he tweeted. “It’s like training for the 100 yard dash vs. a marathon. The brilliance of the Electoral College is that you must go to many States to win.”
But with the popular vote mandate, candidates are forced to focus on “just the large states.”
Meanwhile, cities would end up running the United States, he wrote.
“Smaller States & the entire Midwest would end up losing all power – & we can’t let that happen. I used to like the idea of the Popular Vote, but now realize the Electoral College is far better for the U.S.A.,” Trump tweeted on March 19.
Trump won the 2016 presidential election over rival Hillary Clinton after securing the electoral vote 304 to 227.
Origins of the Electoral College
In “The Federalist Papers,” U.S. founding father James Madison wrote that a republic, such as the United States, is able to “refine and enlarge the public views by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial considerations.”He then criticized pure democracies.
They are “spectacles of turbulence and contention” and have “been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths,” Madison wrote.
“It was equally desirable that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements that were proper to govern their choice. A small number of persons, selected by their fellow citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to so complicated an investigation,” he wrote.