The attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) husband would not take attention away from voters who are more focused on kitchen table issues, according to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
“The reality is for most Americans, the price of food the price of gasoline, the price of heating oil, the crime level in their city, the number of illegal immigrants coming in—there are lots of things going on that affect Americans personally every day,” Gingrich, a contributor to The Epoch Times, said in an interview.
“That, I think, has much more impact on the election,” he said.
Gingrich, who knows the 82-year-old Paul Pelosi, called the incident “horrible” and wrong. “He’s in our prayers,” the former speaker said.
President Joe Biden, for one, linked the attacker’s alleged words to rioters’ “Where’s Nancy?” chant during the Jan. 6 Capitol breach, referring to media reports citing anonymous sources that DePape had asked “Where’s Nancy” during the break-in. Biden also blamed Republicans for inciting political violence.
Republicans, meanwhile, have argued that this incident spotlights the crime crisis faced by big cities like San Francisco.
But Gingrich doesn’t believe the event has “any political effect that matters.”
“I think the fact that it’s turned out that this is not a legal immigrant, who shouldn’t have even been in the U.S., tells you something about our failure to control the border and to control people who are breaking the law,” he said, referencing a Fox News report, citing an anonymous Immigrations and Customs Enforcement official, that DePape is a Canadian-born who has long overstayed his visa in the United States.
Faulting Republican rhetoric for allegedly inciting violence also fails to recognize such comments coming from the other side, Gingrich contended.
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) in March 2020 landed in hot water when he appeared to threaten conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh and and Neil Gorsuch, warning them they “will pay the price” and that they “won’t know what hit” them if they ruled in favor of restricting abortion rights. Following intense criticism, Schumer later conceded that he “shouldn’t have used the words” he did, but insisted that he wasn’t making a threat.
While Gingrich conceded that there is “too much harsh language” in the political landscape nowadays, he doesn’t think “the Democrats are in a very good position to blame Republicans.”
“I think there’s more than enough to go around,” he added.
“I think it’s exactly wrong. Because if your city is that dangerous, why aren’t we set protecting everybody in the city?” he said.
“Generally speaking, you don’t have continuous security when you are not like the president or the vice president, and I don’t think we should,” he said.
“I don’t want to see us become a country where as long as you’re rich and powerful, you’re okay, but everybody else is in danger. I want us to lock up criminals so that the city is safe for everybody,” Gingrich said.