Attorneys general from 22 U.S. states sent a letter on Sept. 13 to members of the Net Zero Financial Service Providers Alliance (NZFSPA), warning them that their collective action against the fossil fuel industry may violate state and federal antitrust laws.
“We have laws that say that competitors need to compete and that when consumers suffer as a result of collusion between industry participants, that’s a problem,” Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti, author of the letter, told The Epoch Times.
Other groups under the GFANZ umbrella include the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative (NZAMi), the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), the Net Zero Insurance Alliance (NZIA), and the Net Zero Asset Owners Alliance (NZAOA).
The issue that these members are facing, however, is that it is illegal under U.S. antitrust laws, including the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, for companies to collude against other companies or industries.
The “consumer welfare standard” in antitrust law also considers the extent to which corporate collusion harms consumers by restricting competition or driving up prices.
“Accordingly, collective agreements to ‘restrict production, sales, or output’ are almost always illegal,” the AGs wrote. “Similarly, ‘an agreement among competitors not to do business with targeted individuals or businesses may be an illegal boycott, especially if the group of competitors working together has market power.’”
That effort was led by the attorneys general of Louisiana, Jeff Landry, and Utah’s Sean Reyes.
“I am concerned the Net Zero Insurance Alliance is stifling competition in Louisiana and driving up insurance costs for our consumers,” Landry stated. “We are investigating if their actions violate our antitrust and consumer protection laws.”
“We’ve seen some companies when they realize that what seemed like a good idea and a noble cause was actually a potential antitrust violation, they’ve withdrawn from the alliances,” Mr. Skrmetti said.
“They think, ‘Hey, we’re helping the environment,’ but the way that this is structured, it’s really limiting consumer choice by moving a big part of the industry all in the exact same direction,” he said.
“Once they got a proper understanding of what they were doing, I think perhaps many of them decided it was not worth the risk.”
The AGs’ letter to members of the NZFSPA demands that they respond by Oct. 13 and, among other things, “describe in detail all communications related to your commitments to NZFSPA, including communications between you and any other NZFSPA signatories,” as well as “any communications related to your partnership with Race to Zero, including any actions you have taken to ‘halve global emissions by 2030’ or establish a ‘zero carbon world.’”
The Epoch Times reached out to the NZFSPA for comment but has not received a response.