Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) has proposed a new draft bill that aims to defund Planned Parenthood by placing a one-year moratorium on federal funding to the organization, in line with the longstanding goal of many Republicans who oppose the organization’s provision of abortions.
The legislation also requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Agriculture to recover any federal aid received by Planned Parenthood or its affiliates or clinics, in case of non-compliance with the certification that they will not perform abortions during the moratorium period.
Federal tax dollars that would have gone to Planned Parenthood would instead be directed to community health centers, according to the draft bill. Specifically, the bill seeks to redirect $235 million to such centers across the United States that provide healthcare to women.
‘Profit Off the Violence of Abortion’
Boebert’s bill has been endorsed by Students for Life of America, the National Right to Life Committee, Heritage Action, and Concerned Women for America.“There’s no single entity that stands to make a profit off the violence of abortion more than Planned Parenthood,” Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life of America, said in a statement.
“Deceitfully, Planned Parenthood guises their business model as one that helps women while their latest annual report shows they made $633 MILLION from taxpayers while ending 383,460 little lives in that same time frame,” Hawkins said, adding that screening services provided by Planned Parenthood have dropped by double digit percentages “proving they’re in the business of abortion.”
Background
The move to defund Planned Parenthood has been a longstanding goal of many Republicans, who object to the organization’s provision of abortion services. They argue that federal funds should not be used to support an organization that performs abortions, and that the money should instead be redirected to other healthcare providers.Planned Parenthood, on the other hand, has argued that it provides a wide range of critical healthcare services, including cancer screenings, birth control, and testing for sexually transmitted infections, in addition to providing abortion services.
The organization has argued that defunding it would result in a loss of access to important non-abortion services for many low-income communities.
If passed, the Defund Planned Parenthood bill would likely face significant opposition from Democrats and abortion advocates, who would see it as an attack on women’s reproductive rights and access to healthcare.
The bill’s future is uncertain as it will need to pass through several legislative stages before it can become law.
Introduction of the bill comes amidst a larger conversation in the country regarding abortion rights.
Other Anti-Abortion Legislative Actions
Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.) on Friday introduced the Teleabortion Prevention Act, which would mandate that individuals seeking an abortion pill must have a physical examination, take the medication on-site at the clinic, and attend a post-treatment visit.Also on Friday, Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) introduced the Protecting Individuals with Down Syndrome Act and the Protecting Life on College Campus Act in their respective chambers.
The proposed Protecting Individuals with Down Syndrome Act would prohibit doctors from performing abortions due to a prenatal Down syndrome diagnosis and make it illegal for anyone to coerce a mother into having an abortion for this reason.
Those who break the law would face fines and/or up to five years in prison, but the mother would not face prosecution.
The Protecting Life on College Campus Act would bar colleges and universities that have abortion clinics targeted at students or staff, or have affiliations with such clinics, from receiving federal funding.
Like Boebert’s bill to defund Planned Parenthood, the other pro-life legislation is likely to face opposition by Democrats and other groups that oppose curbs on access to abortions.