Why America Is Behind, Not Ahead, in Net Neutrality

On Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission voted to reclassify internet service providers as a “telecommunications service.” If the decision is upheld in the inevitable court challenges, the FCC will have broad authority to regulate minute aspects of broadband companies in the name of protecting consumers and fostering innovation.
Why America Is Behind, Not Ahead, in Net Neutrality
Protesters hold a rally to support 'net neutrality' and urge the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to reject a proposal that would allow Internet service providers to create internet fast lanes, on May 15, 2014 at the FCC in Washington, DC. KAREN BLEIER/AFP/Getty Images
|Updated:

On Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to reclassify Internet service providers as a “telecommunications service.” If the decision is upheld in the inevitable court challenges, the FCC will have broad authority to regulate minute aspects of broadband companies in the name of protecting consumers and fostering innovation.

The reclassification will allow the FCC to restrict Web-traffic throttling, the creation of “fast-lanes” on the Web, and other services it deems unscrupulous, but cable companies protest that the move grants the FCC excessive powers that could hamper the development of new services.

The final draft of the 322-page resolution that the FCC passed is not yet open to the public, but the document isn’t the only source for imaging the possible effects of net neutrality. Although the term “net neutrality” was coined by a researcher in the United States, the idea has spread across the world, and several nations have adopted net neutrality like rules in the past few years.

Chile

Chile was a pioneer in net neutrality, passing sweeping laws in 2010 that forbid companies from offering different levels of Web access at different prices. In 2014, it ordered wireless carriers to halt their cooperation with Facebook Zero, which allows a bare-bones version of Facebook to not count toward users’ data usage. Presumably Facebook compensates the wireless carriers for the promotion.

The decision to strike down Facebook Zero in Chile appeared as a confirmation of the concerns of the opponents of net neutrality, that it would stifle innovation and discourage investment in Internet infrastructure. Chile has a mobile Internet penetration rate of around 25 percent, high by Latin American standards, but still less than half of the rate in the United States. Facebook Zero has been instrumental in expanding Internet access in many developing nations because it allows Internet providers to directly monetize from websites their customers are using.

European Union

The Netherlands passed net neutrality laws in 2011, in reaction to plans by the Dutch telecom company KPN to impose additional fees on customers who use apps like WhatsApp. KPN initially raised the price of mobile data plans by moderate amounts, but those prices have since declined, and net neutrality advocates have declared the Netherlands experiment a success, although it hasn’t been without its wrinkles.

Jonathan Zhou
Jonathan Zhou
Author
Jonathan Zhou is a tech reporter who has written about drones, artificial intelligence, and space exploration.
Related Topics