A judge in Michigan ruled Monday that the state can release the names of an election investigation team that performed a forensic audit on voting machines and software last year.
Circuit Judge Kevin Elsenheimer listened to arguments by Matthew DePerno, representing plaintiff William Bailey, and state lawyers before making his decision.
“Plaintiff and the forensic team fear that disclosing the names and personal information (such as resume, curriculum vitae, address, and employer) will be detrimental to the forensic investigators,” DePerno wrote in the motion.
“Now he wants to protect the identity of the people responsible for making that report. I don’t understand the argument and I don’t think there’s any legal basis for it,” Grill said. “Who these people are and their professional credentials is super important to making an evaluation of the credibility of the report.”
Elsenheimer sided with the defense, saying, “As for the release of the witnesses by name and their identifying business associations, the court believes that is, frankly, part of the process.”
While the names will be released, the judge said personal information including phone numbers will not.
Dominion and state officials have challenged the report, alleging it twisted some aspects of the voting system and included falsehoods about others.
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, a Democrat, said Monday that the state is drafting an order relating to the disclosure of names “and we fully expect plaintiff and his counsel to be forthcoming with those names.”