Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas) is among the U.S. lawmakers on a growing list of House members calling on President Joe Biden to refreeze the $6 billion in Iranian assets that he unfroze just before Hamas terrorists murdered more than 1,400 Israeli men, women, and children in an Oct. 7 massacre.
“While Hamas deserves the lion’s share of the blame, Iran cannot go unpunished for its role. With this in mind, I am calling on the administration to immediately freeze the $6 billion in Iranian assets,” he stated.
Mr. Allred’s announcement likely would have gained little notice but for two factors.
Mr. Allred is the heavy favorite for the nomination, as currently, only two little-known Democrats are opposing him.
The Cruz–Allred battle is sure to be among the most watched elections in 2024, as the Republican incumbent weathered a strong 2018 challenge from Democrat Beto O'Rourke by only 3 percentage points.
The second reason that Mr. Allred’s $6 billion freeze announcement raised eyebrows is his uncomfortable history of backing U.S. aid to the Gaza Strip and the West Bank in 2021 that a State Department counterterrorism financing expert said could benefit the Hamas terror organization.
Hamas has had total control of the area since Israel’s withdrawal in 2006, and other Muslim terrorist operations.
Since then, Hamas has launched thousands of guided and unguided rockets into Israel, killing many people, and has trained terrorists and sent them on suicide attacks in public places.
The massive surprise attack from the Gaza Strip on Oct. 7 killed the most Jews in one day since the Nazi Holocaust.
Soon after taking office in 2021, President Biden gave orders to restart the flow of U.S. aid to the Gaza Strip that his predecessor in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump, had halted.
With as much as $350 million in renewed assistance at stake, Republicans in Congress and elsewhere immediately raised objections. Among them was Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho), who exercised Senate privilege by placing a hold on $50 million of the authorizing legislation.
“We write with a great sense of urgency to respectfully request that you release your hold on tens of millions of dollars in appropriated humanitarian aid that is so desperately needed to meet the needs of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian civilians rebuilding their lives in the wake of the fighting between Hamas and Israel earlier this month.”
Mr. Risch’s concern was that some part of the U.S. aid going to the Palestinian Authority would end up benefitting Hamas by helping to finance benefits to the families of suicide bombers.
That concern was shared within the Department of State.
“Other terrorist groups are present in the West Bank and Gaza, including Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), the Palestine Liberation Front (PLF), and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).
“[Due to its overall strength and level of control over Gaza, we assess there is a high risk Hamas could potentially derive indirect, unintentional benefit from U.S. assistance to Gaza. There is less, but still some risk, U.S. assistance would benefit other designated groups].”
The memo’s author, Andrew Weinschenk, then-director of the Office of Threat Finance Counter-Measures in the State Department, couldn’t be reached for comment.
Mr. Cruz was quick to respond to Mr. Allred’s call to refreeze the $6 billion.
Mr. Allred’s difficulties regarding Israel and Islamic terrorism aren’t limited to the present controversy over his position on freezing the $6 billion for Iran.
Mr. Allred’s spokesman didn’t respond to a request for comment.