House Committee Subpoenas Author of Scientific Paper Meant to Disprove COVID Lab Leak Theory

House Committee Subpoenas Author of Scientific Paper Meant to Disprove COVID Lab Leak Theory
Kristian Andersen briefs reporters in San Diego, Dec. 30, 2020. The Associated Press
Aldgra Fredly
Updated:
0:00

The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic issued a subpoena on Friday demanding the private messages of Dr. Kristian Andersen relating to a research study meant to disprove the COVID-19 lab leak theory.

Subcommittee Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) said that a subpoena had been issued for documents and communications from Andersen’s Slack messaging channel.

This is in relation to an academic paper titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” which Andersen co-authored and published in Nature Medicine in March 2020. The paper says the virus has a natural origin.

Andersen, a virologist at the Scripps Research Institute, testified before the subcommittee on June 16 that he and the co-authors communicated primarily over Slack while drafting the paper.

During the hearing, Andersen said that he had not provided all messages relevant to the subcommittee’s inquiry because not all participants of the Slack channel—which he privately owned—approved of their release.

Wenstrup said the subpoena was issued to compel the production of Andersen’s Slack messages relating to the “drafting, publication, and critical reception” of the academic article and the origins of COVID-19.

“We are following the breadcrumbs of a COVID-19 cover-up straight to the source,” Wenstrup said in a press release.

“Andersen played a pivotal role in potentially suppressing the lab leak hypothesis, and Americans deserve to know why this happened, who was involved, and how we can prevent the intentional suppression of scientific discourse during a future pandemic,” he added.

Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) during a House Veterans' Affairs Committee hearing in Washington, on Sept. 26, 2017. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) during a House Veterans' Affairs Committee hearing in Washington, on Sept. 26, 2017. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Wenstrup said the authors “may have possessed conflicts of interest for supporting a zoonotic origin of COVID-19.”

A copy of the subpoena seen by The Epoch Times states that Andersen will be required to provide all Slack documents and communications dated from Jan. 1, 2020, to June 23, 2023, regarding the origins of COVID-19, which referenced former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and former National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Dr. Francis Collins, among others.

Fauci’s Alleged Role in Drafting Study

The subcommittee issued a memo (pdf) on March 5 saying that it uncovered new email evidence suggesting that Fauci “prompted” the drafting of the study.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Sept. 14, 2022. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Sept. 14, 2022. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

The memo detailed a conference call between Collins, Fauci, and at least 11 other scientists in early February 2020, about a week after the first Chinese Communist Party (CCP) virus—commonly known as the novel coronavirus—case was confirmed in the United States.

Collins, Fauci, and others were warned in the Feb. 1, 2020, call about the possibility that the virus may have leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, in late 2019, according to the memo.

Citing internal emails, the committee asserted that Fauci “prompted” Andersen to write the paper and that it was designed “to ‘disprove’ any lab leak theory.”
The Proximal Origin paper’s abstract suggested that the virus may have emerged via Malaysia pangolins because they “contain coronaviruses similar to SARS-CoV.”

“The presence in pangolins of [a virus’ receptor-binding domain] very similar to that of SARS-CoV-2 means that we can infer this was also probably in the virus that jumped to humans,” the paper reads.

But the March 5 memo, citing internal emails, stipulated that Anderson “did not find the pangolin data compelling” and only wrote the paper after being “prompted” by Fauci, Collins, and the others.

“Privately, Dr. Andersen did not believe the pangolin data disproved a lab leak theory despite saying so publicly. It is still unclear what intervening event changed the minds of the authors of Proximal Origin in such a short period of time,” the House committee stated.

Jack Phillips contributed to this report.
Aldgra Fredly
Aldgra Fredly
Author
Aldgra Fredly is a freelance writer covering U.S. and Asia Pacific news for The Epoch Times.
Related Topics