The pandemic has caused a greater downturn than expected on services consumption, manufacturing activity, and construction, leading to the revision.
“Our estimates imply that a bit more than half of the near-term output decline is made up by yearend and that real GDP falls 6.2 percent in 2020 on an annual-average basis (vs. 3.7 percent in our previous forecast),” according to the forecast, which was cited by The Hill.
While predicting a V-shaped economic rebound, the report’s author concedes the second-quarter collapse “would represent a decline that is more than three times larger than the previous low in the history of the modern U.S. GDP statistics.”
Fed Predicts 32 Percent Unemployment in Q2
St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, in an interview with Bloomberg TV on March 30, referred viewers to a Fed note with jobless projections based on occupations “exposed to layoff risk due to social distancing” amid the outbreak.“If you read the blog carefully, you'll see that there is a way to bound the unemployment rate—it’s going to be somewhere between 10 percent and, I think, the upper bound is around 42 percent,” he said.
The Fed’s “back-of-the-envelope” calculations use two different models to give optimistic and pessimistic estimates, and show a second-quarter jobless rate ranging from 10.5 percent to 40.6 percent, with 27.3 million jobs lost at the lower bound and 66.8 million in the upper limit.
Fed analysts averaged the two, for a most likely outcome of 47.05 million people losing their jobs in the second quarter.
“Summing to the initial number of unemployed in February, this resulted in a total number of unemployed persons of 52.81 million. Given the assumption of a constant labor force, this resulted in an unemployment rate of 32.1 percent,” Fed economist Miguel Faria-e-Castro wrote.
Bullard said there is considerable uncertainty around the estimates, which are strongly impacted by factors like whether businesses keep workers on their payrolls by taking advantage of federal pandemic relief programs.