Dr. Stanley Milgram was not a one-hit wonder in the field of social psychology, but his career arguably peaked in 1961. Yes, he continued to produce original and even groundbreaking research throughout his professional life, but he would always work under the shadow of the Yale experiments that bear his name.
Milgram’s life and work are dramatized in an aptly psychologically expressive fashion in Michael Almereyda’s “Experimenter,” which opens Oct. 16 in New York.
You have heard of Milgram’s work whether you know it or not, but in the early 1960s, plenty of unsuspecting subjects volunteered for his study on obedience and authority.
Each participant agreed to serve as the “Teacher,” whose role was to administer electric shocks of increasing and potentially lethal power to the “Learner” for every wrong answer. Despite the pre-recorded screams of pain, they continued to mete out the punishment because a man in a lab coat told them to.
The high percentage of subjects administering the maximum voltage startles even Milgram himself. For years, the implications of the test and the underlying deception are hotly debated. They make Milgram’s name and establish him as an expert, but he regularly finds himself re-debating his techniques and assumptions.
Of course, his critics did their best to ignore the elephant in the room, which Almereyda boldly represents with a real elephant trailing Milgram down hallways. He was after all, the American-born son of Eastern European Jews, who was understandably fascinated by the Eichmann trial roughly coinciding with his [in]famous experiments.
“Experimenter” is a relentlessly stylized film that deliberately eschews any pretense of verisimilitude. Yet, it almost has to reject the trappings of conventional drama to accommodate Almereyda’s comprehensive survey of Milgram’s work and the criticisms he faced.
Milgram is a decidedly cold fish, but his constant fourth wall breaking commentary is fascinating stuff. Ranging freely between arrogance and defensiveness, Peter Sarsgaard gives one of the strangest, but still unconventionally effective performances you will see this year.
Throughout it all, we still get a sense of his personality and watch him develop relatively convincing chemistry with Winona Ryder’s Sasha Menkin Milgram. We get a sense of him as a husband and family man, who went to work to warn Americans they could easily carry out any number of atrocities, if they were duly ordered to while in a compliant “agentic state.”
Frankly, it takes a while for viewers to banish their reservations and buy into Almereyda’s rear-screen projections and self-consciously artificial backdrops.
However, the artistry of Ryan Samul’s cinematography and the wonderfully exaggerated but not quite over-period look crafted by production designer Deana Sidney and art director Andy Eklund is immediately impressive.
It is also hard to beat the surreal eccentricity of Milgram meeting William Shatner and Ossie Davis (played with fitting attitude by Kellan Lutz and Dennis Haysbert) on the set of a TV movie based on his experiments.
It is rather encouraging to see a film as ambitiously cerebral as “Experimenter” let loose in theaters. Yet, it comes at an opportune time, when fewer people seem to have the skills to rigorously question and dissect what the media tells them.
Intellectually challenging and visually playful, “Experimenter” is a film that engages on multiple levels. Recommended for unruly freethinkers, it opens Oct. 16 in New York at the Landmark Sunshine.
“Experimenter”
Director: Michael Almereyda
Stars: Peter Sarsgaard, Winona Ryder, Taryn Manning
Running Time: 1 hour, 30 minutes
Release date: Oct. 16
Rated
3.5 stars out of 5
Joe Bendel writes about independent film and lives in New York. To read his most recent articles, visit JBSpins.blogspot.com
