Ten senators and representatives, led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), expressed concern about the Fed’s current monetary-policy initiatives and how these tightening efforts could engineer a recession.
“We write regarding our concern about the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy strategy and its potential to throw millions of Americans out of work,” they wrote in a May 1 letter, adding that an “overreaction” could leave the economy more “vulnerable.”
“We strongly urge you to respect the Fed’s dual mandate, pause your rate hikes, and avoid engineering a recession that destroys jobs and crushes small businesses.”
The U.S. officials argued that recent economic data suggest that additional rate hikes would be “unnecessary” and “needlessly threaten” the economy’s progress. They acknowledged the Fed’s policy independence, but noted that continuing to pull the trigger on rate hikes would abandon the institution’s dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment.
“While the Fed should remain flexible to incoming data as it assesses the economy’s progress toward achieving lower inflation, the evidence to date suggests that progress can continue to be made without slamming the brakes on the economy and costing millions of Americans their jobs,” the lawmakers said.
The letter, which also featured Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), was sent to Powell ahead of the much-anticipated Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) policy meeting on May 2–3.
To Pause or Not to Pause
With the annual inflation rate slowing every month since hitting a peak of 9.1 percent in June, many economists and market analysts have advocated for the Fed to hit the pause button.“The danger was being too tight, not too loose. The Fed rhetoric—higher for longer—really would guarantee a recession,” he said. “I think it’s the day of reckoning is sooner.”
“I suspect the least bad is a pause,” the top economist told CNBC. “After the hikes we’ve seen, make sure that the financial contagion is behind us. And then try to assess the economic contagion, which is harder to counter with policy.”
“Several participants noted that, in their policy deliberations, they considered whether it would be appropriate to hold the target range steady at this meeting,” the minutes stated. “They noted that doing so would allow more time to assess the financial and economic effects of recent banking-sector developments and of the cumulative tightening of monetary policy.”
But Fed governor Christopher Waller thinks rates need to be higher to achieve the central bank’s inflation fight, adding that investors should not anticipate rates to ease anytime soon.
“Monetary policy will need to remain tight for a substantial period of time, and longer than markets anticipate.”
Goldman Sachs analysts believe the FOMC will “signal” a June pause, but also “retain a hawkish bias.”
Northern Trust economists think the Fed will “lay the groundwork for a pause, and push back against an early pivot.”