As then-President Donald Trump was trying to tackle COVID-19 in 2020, the “swamp” or “deep state” was working against him, using flawed data to tarnish him, locking down society, and keeping schools closed, according to Dr. Paul Alexander.
“They’re working against him. So you need to be there to understand when he said ‘the swamp’—and he talked about ‘deep state’—it is real. I dealt with them. It is the bureaucracy. The entrenched bureaucracy is real.”
From late March 2020 until early September of that year, Alexander served as scientific adviser to Michael Caputo, then-assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
During that time, Alexander was attacked by the media and some health agency officials for trying to “tweak” the COVID-19 death numbers in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).
At the time, he also pushed for herd immunity to handle the pandemic, insisting the only way to do so was to allow non-high-risk groups to be exposed to the virus.
However, some media outlets depicted Alexander’s proposal as trying to get people infected intentionally. They also claimed that Caputo was promoting unfounded accusations and conspiracy theories in a Facebook video. Pressure from the media and some government officials later led to the departure of Caputo and Alexander.
On Sept. 16, 2020, HHS announced that Caputo would take a 60-day medical leave of absence, and Alexander would leave the department.
“The New York Times wrote—now it’s part of the public discussion—that the CDC reporting to the public and the data is suboptimal. It’s incomplete. It’s not balanced. It’s missing information. So that is exactly what I was trying to say two years ago, that I was attacked for,” Alexander said.
“The CDC removed 72,000 deaths. Why? I will say it this way, under the Trump administration, the CDC worked with the NIH [National Institutes of Health] and the media to make the response terrible for him. Make it look, on a day-to-day basis, terrible, like bad. And they will do that with the numbers. They will report escalating infections, escalating cases, any which way they could,” Alexander said.
“But now, in the present administration, they want to remove those deaths and those problematic metrics because it makes the present administration look bad. Fact is that more people have died from COVID under President [Joe] Biden than died under President Trump.”
Lockdown Based on Flawed Numbers
In early April 2020, the United States reported more than 260,000 COVID-19 cases and about 6,200 deaths. On April 1, 2020, Trump said he would leave it up to state governments to decide whether to implement lockdowns. A day later, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told CNN that there should be a federal lockdown.“I don’t understand why that’s not happening,” he said.
On March 20, 2020, California became the first state to order a lockdown. By the end of May 2020, 42 states and territories issued mandatory stay-at-home orders.
Alexander said the lockdowns were based on flawed numbers, and no studies showed they work.
“They closed society on a test that had a 97 percent false positive,” he said, referring to the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test that is still widely used to determine a positive COVID-19 infection.
“And remember, at that point, we were having problems in terms of how deaths were classified, how COVID infections were classified, and whether we were really having such an extensive number of infections or cases or hospitalizations,” he said.
“We were having a problem at that point with the PCR test. The PCR tests [were] over-cycled, and we knew over 24 cycles,” Alexander said. “Once you cycle over 24, 25, you are picking up viral dust and viral junk, non-infectious, non-viable pathogens. So let me put it this way, the vast majority, maybe 90 percent of people in 2020 and 2021, who were designated as COVID-positive with PCR tests were false-positive.”
An Irish doctor first claimed that PCR tests have a false rate of 97 percent. Some fact-checkers deemed the claim as false.
“We’ve argued from the beginning, this was never an emergency that they made it out to be,” Alexander said. “We could have properly protected the vulnerable and let the rest of society live largely normal lives.”
“Trump was working to open society and to open schools. And he had a daily battle with that task force that what you saw there—that was like a clown car show—that was real,” Alexander said. “Behind the scenes, Trump was fighting them, fighting Fauci, fighting [Dr. Deborah] Birx, and the union, and the CDC to open schools because we were getting reports of young children in America hanging themselves. Children across America committed suicide because of the school closures.”
“We could have handled this pandemic just by properly protecting the vulnerable and allowing everybody else to live a normal life, become exposed naturally and harmlessly among their own natural immunity,” Alexander said.
“That’s how we’ve done it for the last 100 years. But with COVID, we’ve done something different. We lock the healthy society down.”
Alexander said he once had a discussion with some State Department officials about Trump.
“They told me in no uncertain terms that ‘Trump is only a visitor here. He doesn’t seem to understand we run things.’”
“‘We the bureaucracy, we the deep state that you call the deep state pal, yes, we run things here. The president just visits here. He‘ll be gone. We’ll be here,’” Alexander recalled.
“That’s how they think. And that is the crux of the matter.”