Alabama legislators have prefiled a bill that would ban the teaching of subjects considered to be divisive in public schools.
Defining ‘Divisive Concepts’
The text of the bill defines “divisive concepts” in a broad range from gender, race, and religion.- A particular race, color, religion, sex, ethnicity, or national origin being inherently superior or inferior to another.
- That any individual should be discriminated against or mistreated based on their race, color, sex, ethnicity, or national origin.
- That the moral character of a person is determined by their race, color, religion, sex, ethnicity, or national origin.
- That by virtue of a person’s race, color, religion, sex, ethnicity, or national origin, the person is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive whether consciously or subconsciously.
- That any of the aforementioned groups are inherently responsible for actions committed in the past by other members of the same group.
- That fault or blame should be placed upon a person based on the aforementioned attributes.
- That any individual should be asked to accept, acknowledge, affirm, or assent to a sense of guilt, complicity, or need to apologize solely on the basis of the aforementioned attributes.
Application in Education
Local boards of education or public colleges and universities may not direct a student, employee, or contractor adhere to any divisive concept, require them to attend or participate in trainings that promote the divisive concepts, share their personal point of views on the concepts, participate in lobbying for legislation at any government level, or penalize anyone on the basis of their refusal to support or adhere to the divisive concepts.Additionally, enrollment may not be conditioned on race or color, and the education authorities are not allowed to authorize, expend or apply for or accept funding that promotes the concepts.
Employees, contractors, and educational authorities are not prohibited from responding to questions raised during conversation or work that pertain to divisive concepts, teaching the concepts in an “objective manner and without endorsement.”
It also would not prohibit required collection or reporting of demographic information by public institutions of higher education or prohibit the teaching of topics in a “historically accurate context.”
Further, the act notes it would not prevent a state agency from promoting diversity or inclusion if the “efforts are consistent with the requirements” of the act.
It would also not be construed to inhibit or violate First Amendment rights or undermine the duty of education entities to protect academic freedom, intellectual diversity, and free expression.
A bill proposed in the Alabama House last year was filed with similar language and replaced earlier bills that related specifically to critical race theory.
The Epoch Times has contacted the bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Ed Oliver, for comment.