The attorneys general of 19 different states have sent a letter to Costco and Kroger warning the retail brands against sending abortion pills through the mail.
While the FDA announcement may have suggested certified pharmacies could more readily dispense the abortion drug, the group of attorneys general argued that the FDA’s relaxed regulations are superseded by existing federal law that prohibits sending abortion medications through the mail system.
“[Y]ou may not yet be aware that federal law expressly prohibits using the mail to send or receive any drug that will ‘be used or applied for producing abortion,’” the attorneys general wrote in letters to executives at Costco and Kroger.
The warning letters were sent by attorneys general from Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia.
“Although many people are unfamiliar with this statute because it has not been amended in a few decades, the text could not be clearer: ‘Every article or thing designed, adapted, or intended for producing abortion ... shall not be conveyed in the mails.’ And anyone who ‘knowingly takes any such thing from the mails for the purpose of circulating’ is guilty of a federal crime,” the attorneys general added.
The prohibitions the attorneys general cited have been in place for over a century, which were implemented under the Comstock Act of 1873.
Revised FDA Rule
The FDA has regulated access to mifepristone for years through its risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS). In the past, the abortion drug could only be given in-person at a hospital, clinic, or medical office. In December 2021, the FDA announced it had revised the REMS rating for mifepristone, eliminating the requirement to administer the drug in-person at a medical facility.President Joe Biden’s administration has criticized the Supreme Court’s decision, and activists have looked for ways to preserve access to abortions in various states.
“Because there are manifold ways in which recipients in every state may lawfully use such drugs, including to produce an abortion, the mere mailing of such drugs to a particular jurisdiction is an insufficient basis for concluding that the sender intends them to be used unlawfully,” the OLC opinion read.
In their letters, the 19 state attorneys general predicted the Biden administration’s interpretation of laws surrounding the mailing of abortion drugs will not stand up to scrutiny in court.
Democrat Attorneys General Suing for More Access to Abortion Pills
While the Republican attorneys general have challenged the OLC’s opinion and the FDA’s decision to allow pharmacists to mail abortion drugs, a group of Democratic attorneys general filed a lawsuit (pdf) last week that would relax restrictions on mifepristone even further. That lawsuit was filed by the attorneys general of Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Vermont.The Democratic state attorneys general argued that while revised FDA regulations allow for sending abortion drugs in the mail, the FDA still heavily regulates who can fill prescriptions for the abortion drug.
“The REMS require burdensome documentation of the patient’s use of mifepristone for the purpose of abortion, making telehealth less accessible and creating a paper trail that puts both patients and providers in danger of violence, harassment, and threats of liability amid the growing criminalization and outlawing of abortion in other states,” the Democratic attorneys general argued.
A federal lawsuit filed in November by the conservative advocacy group Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine has accused the FDA of ignoring science and law to appease pro-abortion advocates when the agency approved mifepristone and misoprostol.
This lawsuit could conflict with lawsuits seeking to ease access to abortion medications and potentially see federal courts issue conflicting decisions.